Every currently existing claimant to the role of one of the prophets known as the "two witnesses" as described in the biblical book of the Revelation, chapter 11, first came declaring that he or she is one of the two witnesses and in not one single case that I am aware of did entirely independent evidence or testimony arise, whether by word of another independent person or by some other clear means not brought forward by this so-called witness or somebody closely connected with the so-called witness (such as a spouse or another such so-called witness, etc.), that the so-called witness is actually a prophet sent by the Ever Living God.
Therefore, the testimony to being a prophet from God by every single one of these self-proclaimed "Revelation 11 prophets" is INVALID. PERIOD!
The precedent is set by Christ Yeshua, Himself...
Joh 5:31 YLT If I testify concerning myself, my testimony is not true;
I guess that about wraps it up for every "two witnesses" claimant on YouTube and anywhere on the Internet. They have ALL FAILED THIS SIMPLE TEST.
Why are they so blind? Because they seek their own glory.
The true "two witnesses" will never come claiming to be the two witnesses or prophets sent by God. They will not come testifying about themselves. Their actions will be the evidence (just as Christ's actions, including miraculous signs, were evidence), their words will be their testimony (just as John's words testified of Christ and Christ's words testified of God), and strangers to them or people reliably independent from them will recognise their actions (just as the disciples did to begin with, followed by many others), understand their words and provide the ongoing testimony of who they are, spreading through the world like an outwardly radiating shockwave. John the baptiser was not a stranger to Yeshua but we know that Yeshua was reliably independent as a witness of who John was because of the testimony of others who were unrelated to John about who Yeshua is. Yeshua testified to His disciples that John was the Elijah to come, but when John was asked this, he denied it. Of course he did! In John's mind, he was just plain old John the baptiser.
Joh 1:21 YLT And they questioned him, `What then? Elijah art thou?' and he saith, `I am not.' --`The prophet art thou?' and he answered, `No.'
However, as pointed out in a previous post, John the baptiser was the Elijah to come, for in spirit and, consequently, in his actions, he was just like Elijah. This is despite the fact that he denied it in both forms; first as the literal Elijah ("Elijah art thou?"... "I am not."), and then as, potentially, the spirit of Elijah but under a different name ("The prophet art thou?"... "No.") How can he be so contrary to what Christ said of him later? Note that Christ Yeshua did not say that John was definitely the Elijah to come (Yeshua gave people the option of accepting or rejecting it) until after John's death. Why? Because only once John fulfilled the role of the Elijah that was to come could anybody definitively say that he was the expected prophet but before completing that ministry it could not be a legally established fact, despite the certainty we can have that Yeshua already knew the outcome. Since Yeshua knew who He, himself, was, He would have had no doubt about who John the baptiser was.
However, as pointed out in a previous post, John the baptiser was the Elijah to come, for in spirit and, consequently, in his actions, he was just like Elijah. This is despite the fact that he denied it in both forms; first as the literal Elijah ("Elijah art thou?"... "I am not."), and then as, potentially, the spirit of Elijah but under a different name ("The prophet art thou?"... "No.") How can he be so contrary to what Christ said of him later? Note that Christ Yeshua did not say that John was definitely the Elijah to come (Yeshua gave people the option of accepting or rejecting it) until after John's death. Why? Because only once John fulfilled the role of the Elijah that was to come could anybody definitively say that he was the expected prophet but before completing that ministry it could not be a legally established fact, despite the certainty we can have that Yeshua already knew the outcome. Since Yeshua knew who He, himself, was, He would have had no doubt about who John the baptiser was.
Likewise, when the two witnesses come, some of us will recognise them because the Holy Spirit within us will testify of who they are and, although we can declare it, we cannot legally state it as fact until after the completion of their ministries and they have been resurrected and gone to be with the Lord, since only upon completion of every detail outlined in scripture will it have become legal, indisputable fact to the world, regardless of the world's rejection of it. As always, every jot and every tittle must be adhered to until the end. In spite of the evidence and fulfillment of the scritpure regarding them, many will refuse to recognise who they were. During their ministry, however, we can only point to the evidence thus far established, such as stopping rain, destroying would-be assassins, causing plagues of various kinds, accurately expounding on the truth of holy scripture and its correct interpretation, testifying of Christ, etc., pointing to each event as it occurs and demonstrating how it all does fit with scripture, but until all things are fulfilled then their being the two witnesses is not technically legal fact. This may seem like splitting hairs but, rest assured, it is not and the enemy will be a very powerful and contentious adversary in the great courtroom of the final judgement... so, please believe me when I say that you do not want to go up against him yourself. That would be just nuts!
Incredible claims require solid evidence and I have seen nothing of the kind from any of these so-called "two witnesses" people. They are all false prophets and every time they write or speak in terms of their claims of prophetic revelation, they increasingly bring judgement upon their own heads and also upon those who follow them, or who are, and remain, under their authority. How important it is for us to walk in the Spirit of the Lord for, if we do not, we are just fodder for the wolves.
So, once again I declare that you can, quite safely, dismiss all current claims people make that they are the two witnesses of Revelation 11. The genuine two witnesses will be silent regarding their identities and their testimony will be of Christ Yeshua and all things relating to Christ but not of themselves.... and though I am a witness and do testify of Christ as is the case for every true believer, I am not one of those much spoken of "two witnesses" described in the book of Revelation (and in any case, even if I was, I wouldn't tell you, now, would I? ;-)
